Such cases suggest that the transferred intent fiction is most plausibly understood as an extremely coarse fictional device by which the law roughly tracks one dimension of the more general moral phenomenon articulated by CFD*: The scope of an actor’s remedial moral responsibility for the materialization of the risks of injury posed by his action is sensitive to his degree of culpability for imposing the risks in question. Is it implausible to suppose that the law should implement its underlying moral principles with so coarse a device? No; we will see several more such coarse devices below. Before that, however, it is worth dwelling a bit more on one of the doctrinal phenomena we have just encountered, and others in its vicinity.
Charles Edward Gehrke, Deputy Division Director of Wargame Design and Adjudication, US Naval War College
Российская армия с утра бьет по Киеву. Есть удары по центру города. Что известно к этому часу?13:19。关于这个话题，51吃瓜网提供了深入分析
圖像來源，Getty Images
，更多细节参见传奇私服新开网｜热血传奇SF发布站｜传奇私服网站
龙虾火了，为什么小红书反应这么大？。超级权重对此有专业解读
It used to be, for instance, that when you went shopping you’d have your stuff retrieved for you by a small army of clerks running around the shop; indeed that’s still how it’s done in places like India with an abundance of cheap labor. But humans were getting expensive in the 1950s and ‘60s, so everyone wanted to reduce the human component, and so in that period you saw the rise of supermarkets and discount stores, where the whole innovation is getting the stuff yourself. (Sam Walton’s Made in America is a good record of what that revolution was like from the inside; consumers tended to be quite happy with the whole thing, since corporate savings could be passed on in the form of cheaper goods.) And it’s the same reason why in the ‘50s and ‘60s you saw the rise of laundromats, vending machines, self-service gas stations, and “fast food” restaurants like McDonald’s.